|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Praise of “Civil Religion”
“Civil Religion” has a bad name. Even Robert Bellah, who popularized the term in 1967, no longer uses it because it has come to connote right-wing desires to fuse church and state as in the case of one proposed Constitutional amendment, meant to recognize the “sovereignty of Christ.”
But religion is often understood, at least in part, as the search for
transcendent meanings. Surely we citizens have the right, indeed the obligation,
to place the workings of our governments and the life of our nation — indeed,
all nations — in the context of the transcendent. What does our life as
a nation, as a society, as the human race, mean?
The Declaration of Independence is full of
theological intimations. Even that entirely secular document, the US Constitution,
is based on religious assumptions arising from the Reformation and the
Enlightenment. Our best leaders articulate a wholesome vision of who we
are as a people, and how to place the events of the day into a larger pattern
of history that makes transcendent sense. In so doing, they — and we —
give voice to Civil Religion.
Thus, in his “Second Inaugural Address,” Abraham
Lincoln describes the unexpected magnitude of the horrors of the Civil
War and reverently places them in the context of a Power that moves in
history toward justice. He speaks without self-righteousness. He
urges reconciliation.
Martin Luther King Jr and many other American
leaders have written and spoken in this tradition, growing out of, and
beyond, a sense of chosenness, covenant, and millennial expectations.
Holidays like Independence Day, Memorial Day,
and Thanksgiving should function as bearers of transcendent meaning for
us as a diverse people, just as Yom Kippur, Christmas, Ramadan, Holi, and
the solstices recall the sacred as disclosed within specific traditions.
Ceding to extremists the right to ponder questions about, and to celebrate,
the meaning of our national life is like vacating citizenship. We become
isolated individuals without a sense of participating with each other in
honoring the meaning of America. Abandoning civil religion because it is
misused is like a Christian despising his own faith because some in its
name are sexist, racist, or homophobic.
We need to recover a sense of respectful public
life beyond partisan divisions and special interests. Instead of disdaining
Civil Religion, we should seek to articulate it as a religion of mutual
responsibility and joyous pluralism.
Sacred Citizenship
To embrace the Memorial Day and the Fourth of July, we reprint a naturalization ceremony address from November 18, 1988. Scholars have called the use of religious categories to interpret public life “civil religion” and “the religion of the Republic.”
New citizens of the United States, Judge Saffels,
members of the bar, and guests:
Last week I sat in another
court, with my eight-year old son, Benjamin. It was very impressive: the
Supreme Court of the United States of America, in session. I pointed out
to my son the first black justice and first woman justice in US history,
so someday he can tell his children he saw this historic court.
As I sat watching, I
thought of being here today, in this court, with you and this day which
is so historic in your personal life history. This is also very impressive:
you have chosen to become citizens of the United States of America. So
I want to say three things about citizenship for your consideration. I
thought a great deal about these things as I showed my son the monuments
and museums of our nation’s capital, in his first visit to Washington,
DC. My thoughts are about loyalty, freedom, and greatness.
The first thought is about loyalty. It is obvious
as you swear fealty to the United States that your national loyalty is
first and foremost to this country, to its laws, its people, and its future.
But citizenship is not just obeying laws. It is also a sense of ownership.
You now have the right to call this country yours.
As I took my son through
the many buildings of the Smithsonian Museum, and I thought at the same
time of standing here before you, I sensed pride at our achievements, so
well displayed at the Air and Space Museum, Benjamin's favorite. As citizens,
we own our nation’s accomplishments. But the National Gallery, the new
Oriental and African art museums, and even the museum of American history
made something else clear: being a US citizen means also being a world
citizen. You still own important memories and traditions of your native
land which no one wants you to discard, because they can enrich the meaning
of America as you contribute them to the community. America’s greatness
lies in part in the innovation from immigrants who brought their backgrounds,
talents, and skills to these shores. After all, except for the Native Americans,
we are all immigrants or children of immigrants.
This became very clear
earlier this month, when for the first time in American history, representatives
of twelve religions gathered in mutual recognition, of all places, here
in Kansas. American Indians, Bahá’ís, Buddhists, Christians,
Hindus, Jains, Jews, Muslims, Shintoists, Sikhs, Unitarian Universalists,
Zoroastrians and others met and celebrated their diversity as part of the
fabric of this continent. The last such gathering was in 1893, as part
of the Chicago world’s fair; but then the distinguished representatives
had to be imported for the occasion. Now they are here all the time: they
are American, and our nation is richer for them.
American loyalty means,
to emphasize, not just obedience to US laws, but a sense of ownership of
this nation's heritage while maintaining reverence for the traditions of
one's native land that you choose to continue to honor.
These days, loyalty
also means planetary citizenship. The stock market crash last year demonstrated
the global interconnectedness of the financial centers of the world. Here
in the American heartland, we send grain around the world, and purchase
imported products of all sorts. But planetary citizenship is not merely
economic interdependence. It is the recognition that our fate as a nation
depends on the well-being of all other nations. The horrible side of this
reality is that we cannot be protected from nuclear war anywhere in the
world, that the depletion of the atmospheric ozone affects all nations
— our ecological unity. The blessed side of this reality is that, with
vastly increased communications, the possibility exists for us to come
to understand each other, and enjoy each other, as we work together for
a healed planet.
The loyalty you pledge
to the United States of America is also an ownership of your own special
past, a door open to full planetary participation.
The second idea I want to discuss is freedom.
Of all the structures in Washington, I love none more than the Jefferson
Memorial. Perhaps it is because I work in the field of religion, I
especially prize Thomas Jefferson’s careful appreciation for the distinct
roles of religion and government. On one hand, the view that “the God who
gave us life gave us liberty at the same time” means that our freedoms
are not granted by the government, but by the very order of nature; that
governments are instituted merely to secure these freedoms. On the other
hand, Jefferson, in promoting the separation of church and state, remarked
that it does him no harm whether his neighbor believes in no god or twenty:
It neither robs my pocket nor breaks my leg, he said. Most odious to him
was the custom of the state, through taxation, supporting churches that
individual citizens did not support.
The subsequent American
consensus has been that religion is so important, the state must generally
not interfere with its free exercise; and on the other hand, that religious
tests may not be imposed upon its citizens, thus strengthening voluntary
religion and separating government from religious intolerance. Personally,
for me, freedom is first of all religious freedom, which permits me to
act in accord with my conscience and conception of duties to a power far
higher than even the most awesome majesty of the state. My understanding
of what is sacred, that on which my life depends, is protected by the state,
ennobling the free discourse about the most important of all concerns.
Thus as an American
citizen, among the precious freedoms you enjoy, is freedom of religion
— you may follow any path, or no path; your conscience is protected as
an American. As an American, you are free.
This brings me to the third idea, American greatness.
Now Americans can be very petty. The last presidential campaign makes this
painfully clear. Nonetheless, at times a special capacity moves us
above the conflicts and divisions of the day into a remarkable
breath of acceptance and understanding — beyond self-righteousness into
mutual focus and compassion.
In Washington,
I thought about this especially when we visited the Lincoln Memorial and
I reread Lincoln’s Second Inaugural Address and was moved, as I always
am. He spoke during the greatest crisis in American history, in the midst
of the most terrible war the nation has ever known. His role was to preserve
the union, and in so doing, he freed the slaves of the south.
But this alone is not
what I mean by greatness. What astonishes is that he was able to look at
the events around him and understand them as part of a pattern of meaning,
a process, a flow of history, and to rise above even his own leadership
of one side against the other in the battle, to extend compassion to all.
Listen to a few of his
eloquent sentences as he speaks to the entire nation of the warring sides:
“Both read the same
Bible, and pray to the same God; and each invokes his aid against the other
. . . . The prayers of both could not be answered; that of neither has
been answered fully.
The Almighty has his
own purposes. If we shall suppose that American slavery is one of those
offenses which, in the providence of God, must needs come, but which, having
continued through His appointed time, He now wills to remove, and that
He gives to both North and South this terrible war as the woe due to those
by whom the offense came, shall we discern therein any departure from those
divine attributes which the believers in a living God always ascribe to
him?
Fondly do we hope —
fervently do we pray — that this mighty scourge of war may speedily pass
away.
Yet if God wills that
it continue, until all the wealth piled up by the bondman’s two hundred
and fifty years of unrequited toil shall be sunk, and until every drop
of blood drawn with the lash shall be paid by another drawn with the sword,
as was said three thousand years ago, so still must it be said, ‘the judgments
of the Lord are true and righteous altogether.’”
And then, having placed
the war in dreadful perspective, displaying the evil of slavery and its
consequences, Lincoln concludes his address with these immortal words:
“With malice toward
none; with charity for all; with firmness in the right as God gives us
to see the right, let us strive on to finish the work we are in; to bind
up the nation's wounds; to care for him who shall have borne the battle,
and for his widow, and his orphan — to do all which may achieve and cherish
a just and lasting peace, among ourselves and with all nations.”
This generosity and
understanding is what I call American greatness. Our news seems too often
to fall into pieces, not patterns. Yet American greatness discerns a larger
meaning in the events that tie us together, and Lincoln is the great example
of articulating that meaning in national history.
In my own lifetime,
and in the lives of many citizens whom you now join, no experience has
been more wrenching than the Vietnam war. One of my reasons for going to
Washington last week, and to take my son, was to see the Vietnam Memorial,
near the Lincoln Memorial. One hardly notices it at first. It is a wall
underground. One slowly walks into the grave and reads one name on the
first black reflecting panel, then two on the next, three, and finally
as one descends all the way, the panel is eight feet high filled with names
of those whose lives are gone. And as one continues walking, one
finally emerges above ground again, having passed through the awful experience,
seeing people touching, kissing the names of their loved ones, tracing
the names on paper. It is a memorial of American greatness, that despite
the conflict of the war, abroad and at home, healing is taking place.
America is not without
flaws and problems. I hope you will help in resolving them. But America
is great because of its capacity to push through to healing and generosity,
to discern a larger pattern in which we all participate, through which
healing arises.
So this week, as I enjoy the company of this court,
and welcome you to citizenship today, I offer the ideas of loyalty, freedom,
and greatness, and pray that your participation in the ongoing life of
this nation may be blessed, as the nation may be blessed by your citizenship.
I took my son to Washington to see the monuments, to learn in a new way
what it means for him to be an American. Yet I also told him that the greatest
monuments of America are not the memorials in Washington, as inspiring
as they are: the truest memorials, calling us to service and generosity,
are America's loyal and free and great citizens such as you and I and all
of us may strive to be.
Historical note:
The phrase “sacred
citizenship” in the title of this essay is a response to “sacred kingship”
of archaic peoples and the medieval “divine right of kings.”